← Rankings

inquirer

npm · Rank #103 of 217

92 / 100 A
3
npm publishers
Distributed credential risk
47M
downloads/week
Blast radius if compromised
13.1y
package age
Established package
21 days ago
last release
Active maintenance
35
GitHub contributors
Source code contributors
Provenance Not enabled
Staged Publishing Not enabled

Risk analysis

inquirer shows healthy behavioral signals: multiple publishers distribute the credential risk, and the package is actively maintained.

What the score measures

  • Publisher depth — How many people can push to npm? Single-publisher packages are the #1 structural risk.
  • Longevity — Older packages have track records. New packages with high adoption are higher risk.
  • Release consistency — Regular releases signal active oversight. Long gaps mean unpatched vulnerabilities.
  • Download trend — Growing packages attract more scrutiny (and more attacks).
  • OpenSSF Scorecard — Process security: branch protection, code review, CI/CD safety.
  • Build provenance — Published versions linked to specific CI runs via SLSA attestation.
  • Staged publishing — Human approval gate between npm publish and going live.

inquirer is one package. Score them all.

You came looking for inquirer. Your node_modules has hundreds more. Run one command to score every dependency you ship:

npx proof-of-commitment

Auto-detects your lockfile. Scores every dependency. Zero install.

Share this score

Add the badge to your README

Commit trust score for inquirer
![Commit Trust](https://getcommit.dev/badge/npm/inquirer)